Tournament Report for:
Dragon Slayer
Mar 28, 2015
Spokane, WA
TD: Stripes
Rating report for Dragon Slayer Section k-2 bishops
pos last name first id numb start end/#gms rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 tot 1 Barrett, Ben OKSBH008 880 896/ 35 W9 W3 L6 W8 W4 4.0 2 Dhillon, Rohan SGSC6836 592 798/ 34 W10 W5 L4 W7 W11 4.0 3 Sheikh, Laura FPRBC498 679 753/ 35 W12 L1 D11 W10 W6 3.5 4 Parlapalli, Ananya PSPC4374 593 782/ 39 W7 D8 W2 W6 L1 3.5 5 Schlegel, Stefen CATBD508 753 722/ 30 L11 L2 W14 W13 W8 3.0 6 Shan, Ethan SGSB6601 684 706/ 22 W14 W11 W1 L4 L3 3.0 7 Falter, Luke FPCCK955 400 658/ 5 L4 W9 W13 L2 W12 3.0 8 Sande, Per SGSB1949 707 710/ 54 W13 D4 W10 L1 L5 2.5 9 Pooler, Isaac FARCH857 588 574/ 10 L1 L7 W12 D11 W13 2.5 10 Hilton, Olivia PSPCK588 901 799/ 49 L2 W12 L8 L3 W14 2.0 11 Craciun, Ian VLCC4299 450 544/ 29 W5 L6 D3 D9 L2 2.0 12 Basnett, Emil SGSBK980 400 400/ 9 L3 L10 L9 W14 L7 1.0 13 Larson, Kaiser RSVCH535 400 400/ 14 L8 D14 L7 L5 L9 0.5 14 Pooler, Aaron FARAD208 400 400/ 9 L6 D13 L5 L12 L10 0.5
Rating report for Dragon Slayer Section k-5 rooks
pos last name first id numb start end/#gms rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 tot 1 Dharani, Mythreya SUPB5637 1216 1232/ 47 W11 W8 W2 W3 L4 4.0 2 Chiang, Kara SGSDC326 1120 1164/ 57 W5 W9 L1 W15 W8 4.0 3 Ambalavanan, Varun PSPDK347 1114 1136/ 65 W12 W24 W4 L1 W14 4.0 4 Morris, Sam SGSD6660 952 1104/139 W14 W6 L3 W7 W1 4.0 5 Naresh, Andrew NWCDC211 752 943/ 60 L2 W29 W18 W9 W16 4.0 6 Rude, Lucas PVEF3635 802 868/ 20 W23 L4 D17 W26 W15 3.5 7 Naresh, Ethan NWCFH407 991 976/ 50 W13 D16 W19 L4 D10 3.0 8 Consiglio, Gavin NWCE1496 905 958/ 15 W20 L1 W10 W11 L2 3.0 9 Alvarez, Annie MEPED860 899 905/ 40 W26 L2 W13 L5 W20 3.0 10 Craciun, Evan VLCFD179 844 872/ 35 W21 D15 L8 W17 D7 3.0 11 Brown, Malia OKSE1512 788 806/ 43 L1 W27 W20 L8 W21 3.0 12 Schlegel, John Paul CATEG015 748 740/ 54 L3 L20 W30 W22 W23 3.0 13 Francis, Tristan MAEF1824 744 755/ 19 L7 W28 L9 BYE W19 3.0 14 Keener, Orrin OKSEH600 723 819/ 40 L4 W23 W24 W19 L3 3.0 15 Waters, Ryan NWCDE718 1043 996/ 60 W25 D10 W16 L2 L6 2.5 16 Kast, Toby PSPE1658 867 851/ 63 W28 D7 L15 W21 L5 2.5 17 Parlapalli, Aniketh PSPDC619 704 708/ 40 L18 W22 D6 L10 W27 2.5 18 Mcmynne, Simon MULD5803 922 879/ 39 W17 L19 L5 U W26 2.0 19 Heckenlaible, Seth OELFY500 797 766/ 22 W30 W18 L7 L14 L13 2.0 20 Fausti, Joseph ARCF7899 657 696/ 35 L8 W12 L11 W24 L9 2.0 21 Saccomanno, Matteo NWCDK711 493 556/ 20 L10 W25 W29 L16 L11 2.0 22 Cai, Jeslyn OKSE4306 436 504/ 18 L24 L17 W25 L12 W29 2.0 23 Whitfield, Joe FARFI351 400 489/ 10 L6 L14 W28 W29 L12 2.0 24 Lubanski, Josh SGSD8453 831 757/120 W22 L3 L14 L20 D25 1.5 25 Davidson, Emmett SPMFE133 745 663/ 29 L15 L21 L22 W28 D24 1.5 26 Ramot, Mason NWCDK752 661 617/ 49 L9 D30 W27 L6 L18 1.5 27 Smith, Ben FARDD140 400 423/ 5 D29 L11 L26 W30 L17 1.5 28 Sheikh, Troy FPREH451 538 483/ 28 L16 L13 L23 L25 W30 1.0 29 Lassiter, Abbey RSVDC747 400 400/ 10 D27 L5 L21 L23 L22 0.5 30 Akramoff, Riffe ARCDK832 400 400/ 5 L19 D26 L12 L27 L28 0.5
Rating report for Dragon Slayer Section k-12 kings
pos last name first id numb start end/#gms rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 tot 1 Casey, Garrett LBYF8919 1568 1572/210 D2 W7 W3 W6 W5 4.5 2 Casey, Braxton LBYHJ393 1432 1469/251 D1 W4 W5 W3 W7 4.5 3 Heckenlaible, Teige OELJY381 1208 1237/ 17 W4 W5 L1 L2 BYE 3.0 4 Hertz, Naomi ARCG8744 1107 1092/ 94 L3 L2 BYE W7 W6 3.0 5 Wu, Ethan SGSF9608 1234 1198/199 W6 L3 L2 BYE L1 2.0 6 Rogers, Garrett LINHE022 593 653/ 9 L5 BYE W7 L1 L4 2.0 7 Serr, Bayden NWLG6720 625 565/ 9 BYE L1 L6 L4 L2 1.0
Rating report for Dragon Slayer Section parents
pos last name first id numb start end/#gms rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 1 Frostad, John ADUNH822 1300 1621/ 3 W6 W7 W3 3.0 2 Hilton, Jeff WAXNC525 942 1032/ 12 W8 W5 W6 3.0 3 Larson, Erik ADUN2036 1100 1136/ 6 W7 W4 L1 2.0 4 Dhillon, Harjeet WAXND428 857 851/ 8 W10 L3 W9 2.0 5 Lassiter, Charlie ADUN4119 1300 929/ 3 W9 L2 W8 2.0 6 Francis, Geoff ADUNC568 1300 793/ 3 L1 W10 L2 1.0 7 Craciun, Filip ADUN1354 1300 800/ 3 L3 L1 W10 1.0 8 Serr, Ben ADUN1041 1300 664/ 3 L2 W9 L5 1.0 9 Brown, Keisha WAXN1533 400 400/ 11 L5 L8 L4 0.0 10 Bohman, Ron ADUN3912 1300 400/ 3 L4 L6 L7 0.0
Note: Tied score standings are resolved by the TD at the event. Results here might not be in tiebreak order.