Tournament Report for:

Knightmare February Quads
Feb 19, 2017
Burnaby, BC

TD:  Chiu

Rating report for Knightmare February Quads Section SecA

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 tot 
  1 Wang, Daniel           ESPDX984  1415  1429/ 74  W3  W4  2.0
  2 Chan, Brandon          MGEHX122  1322  1297/ 91  L4  W3  1.0
  3 Zhang, Daniel          UCEGZ455  1189  1160/ 75  L1  L2  0.0
  4 Singh, Gurbaz          TAMIX91E  1039  1081/ 16  W2  L1  1.0

Rating report for Knightmare February Quads Section Secb

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Liang, Eugene          CPHEZ45F   400  1265/  3  W2  D3  D4  2.0
  2 Baker, Graydon         AQUIX980  1103  1072/ 79  L1  L4  D3  0.5
  3 Chiu, Aaron            TYPFX510  1168  1192/187  W4  D1  D2  2.0
  4 Li, Mengyang           MGEHZ904  1150  1155/ 47  L3  W2  D1  1.5

Rating report for Knightmare February Quads Section SecC

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 He, Matt               SECGZ960   998  1017/ 29  W2  D3  L4  1.5
  2 Wang, Alex             MGEGZ396   997   940/ 56  L1  L4  L3  0.0
  3 Liang, Enoch           CPHEX01Q   400  1273/  3  W4  D1  W2  2.5
  4 Ho, Lyndon             LKIGX798  1048  1086/109  L3  W2  W1  2.0

Rating report for Knightmare February Quads Section SecD

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Chen, Alex             SUSDZ28F   925   959/ 27  W2  L3  W4  2.0
  2 Zhou, Leo              MGECX26Q   927   900/ 12  L1  W4  L3  1.0
  3 Huang, Jalen           LOCHX099   857  1023/  8  W4  W1  W2  3.0
  4 Baker, Roland          BOUGX177   954   871/ 86  L3  L2  L1  0.0

Rating report for Knightmare February Quads Section SecE

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Leong, Aiden           MGEDX657   871   843/ 53  L2  D3  L4  0.5
  2 Jiang, Kate            BIEEZ46W   400  1376/  3  W1  W4  W3  3.0
  3 Chen, Drake            PKLCZ869   859   833/ 45  L4  D1  L2  0.5
  4 Tang, Gideon           RNFEZ492   910   966/ 50  W3  L2  W1  2.0

Rating report for Knightmare February Quads Section SecF

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Guo, Ran               MITDZ54E   820   710/  9  L2  L3  L4  0.0
  2 Zhang, Leo             TYPHZ915   831   866/ 36  W1  W4  L3  2.0
  3 Long, Adam             SCKGZ571   828   965/ 42  W4  W1  W2  3.0
  4 Li, Mengbai            MGEEZ972   849   820/ 36  L3  L2  W1  1.0

Rating report for Knightmare February Quads Section SecG

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Guo, Biaobiao          MITBZ03D   678   758/ 17  W2  L3  W4  2.0
  2 Zeng, Yukai            TYPEZ399   689   625/ 35  L1  L4  L3  0.0
  3 Lam, Ethan             HSTCZ575   828   926/ 20  W4  W1  W2  3.0
  4 Tang, Gwendolyn        RNFGZ736   795   759/ 35  L3  W2  L1  1.0

Rating report for Knightmare February Quads Section SecH

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Zhang, Walter          MGEAX16V   654   700/ 27  L2  W3  W4  2.0
  2 Baker, Oscar           BCXCZ397   599   678/ 57  W1  W4  L3  2.0
  3 Jiang, William         BIEAZ80N   400   772/  3  W4  L1  W2  2.0
  4 Chan, Asher            VAHDX91N   651   571/ 23  L3  L2  L1  0.0

Rating report for Knightmare February Quads Section SecJ

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Shum, Quinton          ESPGX41Z   600   738/  3  W2  W3  L4  2.0
  2 Lu, Max                MGEGZ496   505   617/ 26  L1  W4  W3  2.0
  3 Baker, Hudson          BCXEZ911   567   499/ 82  L4  L1  L2  0.0
  4 Fong, Deryk            CPHGX79V   600   738/  3  W3  L2  W1  2.0

Rating report for Knightmare February Quads Section SecL

 pos last name first       id numb   start end/#gms  rd1 rd2 rd3 tot 
  1 Vodonenko, Daveed      TYPFX50E   500   400/  3  W2  L3  L4  1.0
  2 Pynadath, Abraham      TYPEX57G   400   400/  3  L1  D4  L3  0.5
  3 Adatia, Kaleb          STFDZ957   497   627/ 20  W4  W1  W2  3.0
  4 Luo, Kevin             TYPDZ88P   400   477/  3  L3  D2  W1  1.5

Note: Tied score standings are resolved by the TD at the event. Results here might not be in tiebreak order.